<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Critique on deep ecology</title><link>https://www.deepecology.net/tags/critique/</link><description>Recent content in Critique on deep ecology</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-au</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.deepecology.net/tags/critique/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Essay: Deep Ecology is not Enough – By John Revington</title><link>https://www.deepecology.net/posts/essays/essay-deep-ecology-is-not-enough-revington/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.deepecology.net/posts/essays/essay-deep-ecology-is-not-enough-revington/</guid><description>&lt;p>By &lt;a href="https://www.deepecology.net/posts/profiles/john-revington/">John Revington&lt;/a>. &lt;em>Originally published by the &lt;a href="https://www.rainforestinfo.org.au/deep-eco/revo.htm">Rainforest Information Centre&lt;/a>; republished here with permission.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;em>Publication date not stated on the original page; estimated from internal references (citations through 1995).&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&amp;ldquo;The philosophy of Deep Ecology provides an essential antidote to our culture&amp;rsquo;s prevailing human-centred attitudes. There is nothing intrinsic to the philosophy which promotes simplistic prejudice. However, problems arise when it is misused, when it is seen as the complete explanation of everything. When there is a failure to see that Deep Ecology is not enough.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>